Minimal Match — 35% match
based on chemical composition and mechanical property overlap.
SS 14 22 58 2258 and GOST 4543 12HN3A (GOST 4543-2016) are both steel grades.
Both fall under the Alloy Steel category.
SS 14 22 58 2258 is typically used for heavy duty shafts,gears,aircraft components,crankshafts,forgings,highly stressed bolts, while GOST 4543 12HN3A is commonly used for used for gears, pinions, crankshafts, aircraft parts, and transmission components..
SS 14 22 58 2258 is defined under Swedish Standards (SS) (Sweden).
As per chemical composition, SS 14 22 58 2258 vs GOST 4543 12HN3A is a 56% match.
As per mechanical properties, the match is 15%.
Combined, this makes them a minimal match overall at 35%.
Matched by chemical composition and mechanical properties, not a formal equivalence claim. Always verify against the applicable standard before substitution.
Mechanical Properties
Property
SS 14 22 58 2258
GOST 4543 12HN3A
Tensile Strength
900-1100 MPa
850-1050 MPa
Yield Strength
700-900 MPa
685 MPa min
Elongation
11-14 %
11% min
Hardness
260-320 HB
58-62 HRC (case)
Typical Applications
SS 14 22 58 2258
heavy duty shafts,gears,aircraft components,crankshafts,forgings,highly stressed bolts
GOST 4543 12HN3A
Used for gears, pinions, crankshafts, aircraft parts, and transmission components.
Key Differences
SS 14 22 58 2258 specifies P, S, Mo which are not specified for GOST 4543 12HN3A.
Can SS 14 22 58 2258 Be Substituted With GOST 4543 12HN3A?
SS 14 22 58 2258 and GOST 4543 12HN3A share some compositional similarity but differ enough that substitution should not be assumed. Review the differences above carefully, and consult the applicable standard or a metallurgist before using one in place of the other.
What is the difference between SS 14 22 58 2258 and GOST 4543 12HN3A?
SS 14 22 58 2258 specifies P, S, Mo which are not specified for GOST 4543 12HN3A.
Can SS 14 22 58 2258 be substituted with GOST 4543 12HN3A?
SS 14 22 58 2258 and GOST 4543 12HN3A share some compositional similarity but differ enough that substitution should not be assumed. Review the differences above carefully, and consult the applicable standard or a metallurgist before using one in place of the other.