Minimal Match — 35% match
based on chemical composition and mechanical property overlap.
SS 14 22 58 2258 and UNI 11234 100Cr6 (UNI 11234:2007) are both steel grades.
Both fall under the Alloy Steel category.
SS 14 22 58 2258 is typically used for heavy duty shafts,gears,aircraft components,crankshafts,forgings,highly stressed bolts, while UNI 11234 100Cr6 is commonly used for ball bearings,roller bearings,needle bearings,dies,punches,gauges,wear resistant components.
SS 14 22 58 2258 is defined under Swedish Standards (SS), originating from Sweden, while UNI 11234 100Cr6 is defined under Ente Nazionale Italiano di Unificazione (UNI), originating from Italy.
As per chemical composition, SS 14 22 58 2258 vs UNI 11234 100Cr6 is a 62.8% match.
As per mechanical properties, the match is 25.9%.
Combined, this makes them a minimal match overall at 35%.
Matched by chemical composition and mechanical properties, not a formal equivalence claim. Always verify against the applicable standard before substitution.
Mechanical Properties
Property
SS 14 22 58 2258
UNI 11234 100Cr6
Tensile Strength
900-1100 MPa
750-1000 MPa
Yield Strength
700-900 MPa
400-600 MPa
Elongation
11-14 %
10-14 %
Hardness
260-320 HB
60-64 HRC
Typical Applications
SS 14 22 58 2258
heavy duty shafts,gears,aircraft components,crankshafts,forgings,highly stressed bolts
SS 14 22 58 2258 specifies Mo, Ni which are not specified for UNI 11234 100Cr6.
Can SS 14 22 58 2258 Be Substituted With UNI 11234 100Cr6?
SS 14 22 58 2258 and UNI 11234 100Cr6 share some compositional similarity but differ enough that substitution should not be assumed. Review the differences above carefully, and consult the applicable standard or a metallurgist before using one in place of the other.
What is the difference between SS 14 22 58 2258 and UNI 11234 100Cr6?
SS 14 22 58 2258 specifies Mo, Ni which are not specified for UNI 11234 100Cr6.
Can SS 14 22 58 2258 be substituted with UNI 11234 100Cr6?
SS 14 22 58 2258 and UNI 11234 100Cr6 share some compositional similarity but differ enough that substitution should not be assumed. Review the differences above carefully, and consult the applicable standard or a metallurgist before using one in place of the other.