Minimal Match — 35% match
based on chemical composition and mechanical property overlap.
SS 14 22 58 2258 and NF A35-565 100C6 are both steel grades.
Both fall under the Alloy Steel category.
SS 14 22 58 2258 is typically used for heavy duty shafts,gears,aircraft components,crankshafts,forgings,highly stressed bolts, while NF A35-565 100C6 is commonly used for ball bearings, roller bearings, bearing races, rollers, precision tools, wear resistant parts.
SS 14 22 58 2258 is defined under Swedish Standards (SS), originating from Sweden, while NF A35-565 100C6 is defined under Association Francaise de Normalisation (NF), originating from France.
As per chemical composition, SS 14 22 58 2258 vs NF A35-565 100C6 is a 62.5% match.
As per mechanical properties, the match is 40%.
Combined, this makes them a minimal match overall at 35%.
Matched by chemical composition and mechanical properties, not a formal equivalence claim. Always verify against the applicable standard before substitution.
Mechanical Properties
Property
SS 14 22 58 2258
NF A35-565 100C6
Tensile Strength
900-1100 MPa
850-1100 MPa
Yield Strength
700-900 MPa
Not specified
Elongation
11-14 %
Not specified
Hardness
260-320 HB
60-66 HRC
Typical Applications
SS 14 22 58 2258
heavy duty shafts,gears,aircraft components,crankshafts,forgings,highly stressed bolts
SS 14 22 58 2258 specifies Mo, Ni which are not specified for NF A35-565 100C6.
Can SS 14 22 58 2258 Be Substituted With NF A35-565 100C6?
SS 14 22 58 2258 and NF A35-565 100C6 share some compositional similarity but differ enough that substitution should not be assumed. Review the differences above carefully, and consult the applicable standard or a metallurgist before using one in place of the other.
What is the difference between SS 14 22 58 2258 and NF A35-565 100C6?
SS 14 22 58 2258 specifies Mo, Ni which are not specified for NF A35-565 100C6.
Can SS 14 22 58 2258 be substituted with NF A35-565 100C6?
SS 14 22 58 2258 and NF A35-565 100C6 share some compositional similarity but differ enough that substitution should not be assumed. Review the differences above carefully, and consult the applicable standard or a metallurgist before using one in place of the other.